Comparison
شریف | Sharif vs Proxy MTProto | Прокси 24/7
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ecoshariff | @tproxyru |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.6M | 1.2M |
| Avg views | 209,583 | 100,190 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| 30-day growth | +157.7% | +52.8% |
| Language | فارسی | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2390 days | 100 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ecoshariff
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tproxyru
Questionable
- A sharp subscriber jump between snapshots — possible bulk acquisition
- A young channel with a very large audience
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.